
Patients who developed a serious infection after a procedure involving an Olympus scope may have grounds to file a product liability lawsuit. Lawsuits involving Olympus duodenoscopes and other endoscopes allege that design defects made certain devices difficult to sterilize fully between uses, allowing harmful bacteria to pass from one patient to another.
The Russo Firm represents individuals and families pursuing claims involving defective medical devices and allegations of corporate misconduct that placed patient safety at risk. Our Olympus scope lawsuit lawyers represent clients in mass tort litigation across the country.
Think an Olympus scope may have contributed to a serious infection or the loss of a loved one? Call us today at (954) 767-0676 for a free consultation to discuss your options.
What Is the Olympus Scope Lawsuit About?

The Olympus scope lawsuits allege that certain duodenoscopes and endoscopes exposed patients to dangerous infections because their design made complete sterilization difficult between procedures. Plaintiffs contend that bacteria remained inside the devices even after hospitals followed recommended cleaning protocols.
Specifically, many claims focus on Olympus duodenoscopes used during ERCP procedures. Many claims allege that patients developed drug-resistant ("superbug") infections after procedures using these duodenoscopes.
The FDA has issued an import alert blocking 58 Olympus products from entering the United States, citing ongoing contamination violations at Olympus manufacturing facilities. The action kept the affected products from reaching U.S. hospitals until Olympus addressed the violations.
Olympus has also issued an Urgent Field Safety Notice acknowledging that its existing reprocessing instructions for TJF-series duodenoscopes were insufficient. The notice disclosed two deaths and five serious injuries linked to infections, and Olympus introduced a new requirement for hospitals to inspect scopes under magnification before reuse.
Lawsuits generally assert that Olympus knew or should have known about contamination risks associated with certain scope designs and failed to provide adequate warnings or implement measures sufficient to protect patients. Through these claims, injured patients and families seek compensation and corporate accountability for the harm allegedly caused by defective medical devices.
Concerned that an Olympus scope may have caused a serious infection? The Russo Firm offers free consultations to help patients and families understand their potential legal options. Reach out to our Olympus scope lawsuit lawyers for a free case review.
What Injuries Are Allegedly Linked to Contaminated Olympus Scopes?
Lawsuits link contaminated Olympus scopes to serious bacterial infections and the complications that follow them. The specific harm varies from person to person, and patients who developed such an infection after a scope procedure may be eligible to pursue a claim.
Serious Infections
Many lawsuits involve allegations that patients developed significant bacterial infections after undergoing an ERCP or another endoscopic procedure. These include:
- Tuberculosis
- Septic shock
- CRE infections
- Organ failure caused by infection
- Pseudomonas infections
- E. coli infections
- Drug-resistant bacterial infections
- Bloodstream infections
- Hospital-acquired infections following a scope procedure
- HIV exposure or infection
- Bile duct or pancreatic infections
These infections allegedly resulted in hospitalization, additional procedures, and extensive medical treatment.
Sepsis and Organ Damage
Some lawsuits allege that patients developed sepsis after infections linked to contaminated scopes, resulting in extended hospitalization and lasting harm.
Additional Medical Procedures and Prolonged Recovery
Patients who develop severe infections often require further treatment that extends far beyond the original procedure. Specifically, some individuals allegedly needed additional surgeries, repeat hospital admissions, or intensive care to address complications arising from the infection.
Wrongful Death
Some allegations involve patients who died after developing serious infections following procedures involving Olympus scopes. Drug-resistant infections were linked to contaminated Olympus endoscopes at Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, contributing to at least two patient deaths.
Family members who lost a loved one may have legal options and may be able to pursue claims arising from the harm allegedly caused by a defective medical device.
Not every post-procedure infection means an Olympus scope caused the illness. However, when a serious infection develops after an endoscopic procedure, our team can help investigate what happened to help patients and families understand whether they have a potential claim.
Who May Be Eligible to File an Olympus Scope Lawsuit?
Patients and families affected by serious infections following procedures involving Olympus scopes may have legal options. Eligibility depends on the facts of each case, including the type of procedure performed, the injuries involved, and whether there may be a connection between the device and the harm suffered.
You may qualify for a case review if:
- You underwent a scope procedure and developed an infection that required hospitalization a short time afterward.
- You received a notice from a hospital, surgical center, or other medical provider stating that you may have been exposed to contamination from a reusable scope.
- You required hospitalization, IV antibiotics, surgery, intensive care, or long-term medical treatment after developing an infection following a scope procedure.
- The procedure involved an endoscope, duodenoscope, or another reusable medical scope.
- You underwent a scope procedure and were later diagnosed with a serious infection, such as HIV or tuberculosis.
Meeting one of these criteria does not automatically establish that you have a legal claim. However, these circumstances may warrant a closer investigation into whether a contaminated reusable scope contributed to your illness and whether you may have legal options.
Think you may have been affected by an Olympus duodenoscope or endoscope? Schedule your free case review with our Olympus scope lawsuit lawyers.
What Compensation May Be Available in an Olympus Scope Lawsuit?
Patients and families pursuing Olympus scope lawsuits may seek compensation for the losses associated with serious infections and their consequences. The amount and types of damages available depend on the facts of each case and the laws that apply.
- Medical Expenses: Plaintiffs commonly seek compensation for the costs of treating infections and related complications. These expenses may include hospital stays, emergency care, surgeries, medications, follow-up treatment, and other necessary medical services.
- Lost Income and Reduced Earning Capacity: Serious infections can force patients to miss work or limit their ability to return to their previous employment. In some cases, the financial impact extends well beyond the initial hospitalization and affects a person's future earning potential.
- Pain and Suffering: Severe infections and extended medical treatment can affect nearly every aspect of a person's life. Lawsuits may seek damages for the physical pain, emotional distress, and disruption caused by complications allegedly linked to a contaminated medical device.
- Wrongful Death Damages: When an infection allegedly contributes to a patient's death, surviving family members may have the right to pursue damages permitted under applicable state law. These claims may include compensation for financial losses and the serious personal impact of losing a loved one.
Every Olympus scope case is different. Specifically, factors such as the severity of the infection, the treatment required, the lasting effects of the illness, and the evidence linking the injuries to the device can all influence the potential value of a claim.
Harmed by a dangerous medical device? Schedule your free case review with our Olympus scope lawsuit lawyers at The Russo Firm.
Is there a Class Action or MDL for Olympus Scope Cases?
A class action combines many similar claims into a single case represented by a few plaintiffs on behalf of a larger group. Class actions are commonly used when many people suffered similar economic losses, and the facts are largely the same across the group.
On the other hand, a multidistrict litigation (MDL) is not a class action. Instead, it groups similar federal lawsuits before one court for coordinated pretrial proceedings while allowing each plaintiff to maintain an individual claim.
In medical device cases, including allegations involving contaminated scopes, patients often experienced different infections, treatments, complications, and damages. For that reason, mass tort litigation and MDLs frequently provide a framework that recognizes the unique circumstances of each person's injuries.
Olympus scope lawsuits generally involve allegations of different infections, different severities, and different long-term effects. As a result, many claims are pursued as individual lawsuits that may become part of coordinated mass tort proceedings rather than a single nationwide class action. Filing individually allows each patient's specific damages to be evaluated on their own terms, rather than averaged across a group.
The legal process can seem overwhelming, particularly when large corporations and complex medical issues are involved. The important point is that joining a mass tort proceeding does not erase your individual story. Many claimants find it helpful to know that individual cases can move at their own pace, rather than waiting on a group settlement timeline.
How Can the Russo Firm Help With an Olympus Scope Lawsuit?
Pursuing a claim involving a contaminated medical device can feel overwhelming, especially when you are still dealing with the effects of a serious infection or grieving the loss of a loved one. The Russo Firm helps patients and families understand their rights and guides them through each stage of the legal process.
- Investigations: Many patients do not know the manufacturer of the scope used during their procedure. We can work to obtain and review available records to determine whether an Olympus duodenoscope or another Olympus device may have been involved.
- Evaluating Liability: Product liability cases frequently require a detailed review of medical records, regulatory information, and evidence concerning the device at issue. Specifically, we evaluate whether the facts support allegations that a contaminated scope contributed to a patient's injuries.
- Handling the Litigation Process: Mass tort and medical device litigation can involve complex procedures and extensive documentation. We handle the legal process so that clients and families can focus on their personal responsibilities and health while their claims move forward.
- Pursuing Accountability and Compensation: Our firm believes that corporations should be held accountable when their products allegedly place consumers and patients at risk. Through product liability litigation, we seek compensation for injured individuals while also promoting greater corporate responsibility and patient safety.
At The Russo Firm, we have secured over $2 billion in complex litigation for clients across multiple states and understand the concerns many people have about filing claims against large companies. We offer clear information, answer questions directly, and explain potential options in straightforward terms.
Think you may have been affected by an Olympus scope procedure? Schedule your free case review to discuss your situation and legal options.
Work With Our Olympus Scope Lawsuit Lawyers For Answers After a Serious Infection
A medical procedure that was intended to help you should not leave you questioning whether a contaminated device caused a life-changing infection. If you or a loved one developed a serious infection or other complications after an endoscopic procedure involving an Olympus scope, you should quickly understand your legal options.
The Russo Firm represents individuals and families in complex mass tort and product liability litigation nationwide. We believe corporations should be held accountable when their products allegedly place patients at unnecessary risk. Call our firm today at (954) 767-0676 to schedule a discussion about your situation and chart the way forward.

Olympus Scope Lawsuit Questions Answered by Our Attorneys
Can I file an Olympus scope lawsuit if I did not develop symptoms immediately after my procedure?
Yes. Some patients do not learn of possible exposure until weeks or months after a procedure, and delayed symptoms do not bar a claim. The timing of your diagnosis is only one factor, and an attorney can evaluate whether there may be a connection between the procedure and your injuries.
What if I received a hospital notice about possible scope contamination but never became seriously ill?
Receiving an exposure notice does not automatically create a lawsuit. However, the notice may contain information that becomes important if you later develop complications or have questions about the procedure. Our Olympus scope lawsuit lawyers advise clients to retain the notice and related medical records, as they may be helpful in future lawsuits.
Do I need proof that an Olympus scope caused my infection before contacting a lawyer?
Many patients do not know which manufacturer produced the device used during their procedure or whether contamination played a role in their illness. In this situation, an attorney can coordinate an investigation into medical records and other evidence to help answer those questions.